The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
，详情可参考WPS下载最新地址
�@���V���[�Y�����Ԓ��ɍw���������ŁA4��30���܂łɉ��傷���ƁA1���~�����̃f�W�^���M�t�g�����炦���B�w���ɂ��ẮA1���~�����lj��ł��炦���B
FT Professional
Кроме того, судья преуспел в бизнесе, занимаясь производством изделий из ПВХ. Также у него были коммерческие интересы в сфере строительства и аренды недвижимости. Николайчук сумел заработать не менее двух миллионов долларов, на которые построил торгово-офисный центр в Краснодаре.